| Address: | Lane 230, Section 3, Ding-zhou Rd. |
| - Taipei | |
| Taiwan | |
| Contact person: | Min Jay Kang |
| Email: | kminjay@gmail.com |
| Website: | |
| Date of creation: | re-open (after renovation) October 2010 |
| Type of project: | social housing/artivist village/youth hostel |
| Legal form: | non-profit, legalized historical settlement |
Treasure Hill Co-living Village (or
Treasure Hill Artivists Co-op) is originally a squatter settlement located at
the southwest edge of the Taipei city, a piece of public land characterized by
its intimate physical relations with a small hill as its backdrop and the
adjacent river. It was prohibited from development by the Japanese colonial
government as a water-resource protection area and guarded as a military ward
after WW II, but its convenient and half-hidden location attracted multiple
generations of squatters to engage in self-built activities. At the peak of its
evolution, the Treasure-Hill Settlement was the second homeland of about 200
families and individuals - many of them were senile citizens, single veterans,
social underclass, students, aborigines, and ‘new immigrants’ from
cross-national marriage. Under its informal and pre-modern appearance, it
reminisces the city's organic past and manifests the social network of the
community's spatial structure. The aesthetic value of its chaotic surface, though
debatable, is a clear reflection of the community's daily-life pattern. The
residents' ingenious uses of public and semi-public spaces - makeshift
arcade, waterfront farmland, terrace gardens, corner-store plaza with movable
chairs, to name a few - exhibit collective local wisdom. This mundane hillside
community could have continued to lead an ordinary village life if it was not
zoned as an urban park according to the city's renewed urban plan of 1980. In
1993, the official announcement of demolishing the squatter was posted, and the
Treasure Hill story entered a new chapter.
Treasure Hill as a cultural landscape involves discourses on its relationship
with the surrounding natural environment, its local history, and community
identification. From this stance, conservation of Treasure-Hill has gathered
enthusiastic support from intellectuals, NGOs, and local citizens. After a
series of organized protest and intensive study, the city government took a few
steps back to survey the feasibility of a plan revision. Soon the planning
responsibility for Treasure Hill was transferred from the Department of Park
and Recreation to the newly established Bureau of Cultural Affairs, the
cultural imagination further deepened the polemic of programming a "planned"
village out of an "ordinary" settlement by piecemeal evolution.
OURs (the Organization of Urban Re-s, one of the main facilitators of the
former conservation movement) is later commissioned by the Bureau to undertake
the planning task. The conservation project of the ‘Treasure Hill Co-living
Village’ intends to propose a co-living commune which incorporates the original
resident units as "welfare homeland – an alternative social housing,"
a youth hostel (to balance future financial cost), an ecological learning
field, and an artivists (artist-cum-activist)-in-residency program. All the
residents of the new village may share community spaces and facilities and
various workshops for arts and creative industry. In the long run, all the
labor put to the care of the community is hoped to be transferred as substitute
for rent or meals. The restoration is expected to be completed by November
2010, and some of the original residents have already moved back to their
houses and started to pay much-lower-than-market rent to the city. Social
housing is, in this case, a homeland saved through struggle and action.
Currently under the management of Tsuei-Ma-Ma Foundation for Housing and Community Services in collaboration with the International Artists Village of Taipei, both commissioned by the City government.
Annual budget from the government, monthly rent from the tenants, and profit from (future) youth hostel and shops.
Public-private partnership between the City government, the neighborhood, and NGOs.
The conservation project restores the original village structure and the surrounding green, connected with the city via bike trails and MRT system. It is now zoned as a preservation area with little possibility for further development.
The rent for the original squatter families is around 14 Euro/m2, much lower than average around the adjacent area and the city.


